A video of a productive pond does not establish that a pond will work on another site. FAO's aquaculture guidance treats site selection and suitable water as essential design questions. Use this preparation exercise before digging, stocking animals or altering water flow.

Try it

  1. Describe the proposed project and the land, water, energy and care it would require.
  2. List local permissions, effects on neighbours and wildlife, and questions for a qualified local specialist.
  3. Choose a reversible research step; keep construction and animal introduction outside this plan until assessed.

What to notice

Record which assumptions are supported and which remain unknown. A decision to avoid the project can protect both people and living systems.

Limits and review

This is not an aquaculture design, food-safety protocol or legal permission. The FAO background is older technical material; current local requirements need separate checking. No independent expert has reviewed this card. Evidence certainty has not been assessed.

Calendar settings

The duration and frequency offered by the calendar are editable starting points, not a tested dose or a requirement.

From reading to doing

Create a feasibility question list for a proposed ecological project.

A helpful cue
If I want to copy a nature project from a video, then I will check the site's needs and impacts first.
Suggested time
30 min
Suggested rhythm
1 time a week
Add to my planReview and adjust the step before saving it.

What this rests on

Prepared by
Atlasum · AI-assisted editorial draft
Evidence
Not assessed
Editorial status
Editorial assessment; independent review pending
Independent review
Not completed
Next review planned
10 Dec 2026

Limits and context

  • This is not an aquaculture design, food-safety protocol or legal permission. The FAO background is older technical material; current local requirements need separate checking. No independent expert has reviewed this card. Evidence certainty has not been assessed.

How to review the result

Record which assumptions are supported and which remain unknown. A decision to avoid the project can protect both people and living systems.

What you will need

Your calendar and private notes; professional support where relevant.

Conflicts of interest

No product placement or affiliate links were added to this card. Source authors may have commercial interests.

How we assess claims

Sources you can check

  1. FAO. Considerations in the selection of sites for aquaculture — technical background, not current local permission.

Help make this more accurate

A useful counterexample, a stronger source or a cultural exception can improve this page. Discuss the claim and respect the person.

Discussion

No published comments yet. New comments are moderated.

Sign in to discuss

Revision history

  • — Original editorial seed; not an expert review.